QUOTE(What, no bacon? @ Oct 18 2005, 12:54 PM) [snapback]301263[/snapback]
Notice that it was 4 am in my time zone when I posted that reply. Some of us have things to do during the day.
Right, you have 5 hours to go around posting snide substanceless remarks to show off your stupidity.
QUOTE(What, no bacon? @ Oct 18 2005, 12:54 PM) [snapback]301263[/snapback]
Anyway, 'crap of a movie' is a grammatical nightmare because in English you can't use an unquantified noun [i.e. 'crap'] to describe a quantified noun [i.e. 'a movie']. If you'd said 'piece of crap of a movie', I wouldn't have taken issue with it, because you'd have been using a quantified noun to describe another quantified noun. For instance, you never hear anyone saying, 'wow, that was really slugs of a commute', because 'slugs' is unquantified, while you know there's only one commute being mentioned... it could refer to any number of slugs. People would instead say, 'wow, that was a real slug of a commute', because 'slug' and 'commute' are both quantified as singular nouns. But you don't hear people say that, either, because it's much easier to simply say, 'wow, that was a sluggish commute', because that way, 'slug' gets turned into an adjective, and it's much simpler to speak in simple adjective -> noun phrases, than in similes.
Again you demonstrated your failures in the English language. 'Crap', like water and wood, is a mass (non-count) noun rather than an abstract (unquantified) noun, 'slug' is a count (quantifiable) noun. The classification can be found in this grammar site
here.
From the same site, but under this
link.
QUOTE
When they are generic, non-count nouns and sometimes plural count-nouns are used without articles. "We like wine with our dinner. We adore Baroque music. We use roses for many purposes." But if an "of phrase" comes after the noun, we use an article: "We adore the music of the Baroque." Also, when a generic noun is used without an article and then referred to in a subsequent reference, it will have become specific and will require a definite article: "The Data Center installed computers in the Learning Center this summer. The computers, unfortunately, don't work."
Hence, 'this (article) crap (mass noun) of a (article) movie (count noun)' is a valid phrase. Your interpretation shows a severe lack of understanding in the English language.
QUOTE(What, no bacon? @ Oct 18 2005, 12:54 PM) [snapback]301263[/snapback]
And it's pretty damn cowardly to insult someone anonymously. It ensures that you'll never be held accountable for what you've said, ven though it was completely baseless. So go ahead, Mr./Ms. Guest, try to refute what I've said. Nobody will ever know who you are, anyway.

Yes, like a forum account with made up personal particulars and a temporary validation email account is to solidify one's identity. Of course, you are called Mr What, no bacon? in your tax forms as well.
Your online personality definitely reflects your actual intellect, that of a liar and an idiot.
QUOTE(Jellybean @ Oct 18 2005, 06:39 PM) [snapback]301428[/snapback]
Yeah, take it elsewhere please. Or at least argue about the movie instead of making personal insults. The thread's going way off topic.
That is definitely agreeable. However the waywardness definitely belongs to your fellow registered forumer who displayed a large lack of decorum in launching off a personal attack laced with vulgarity and lies, and continuing it in futile attempts to salvage his/her treasured online reputation, all without even following the topic at hand.