QUOTE(popogeejo @ Apr 13 2006, 01:09 PM) [snapback]380068[/snapback]
I don't thik anyone said Win/Riza.Certainly I wouldn't like it.No double standards here.
QUOTE(popogeejo @ Feb 28 2006, 09:28 PM) [snapback]356549[/snapback]
Choosing between Lust/Sloth and Riza/Winry was the hardest choice ever

Riza/Winry wins though but still cant they all be toether for the sake of love?
Buh?
The whole teenage debate has such a broad gray area that it's really hard to even start pinpointing where it stands on a moral scale. I think most people in our general culture have difficulty with the thought, because of the fact that in recent times, teenagers are now regarded to still be children. This is applicable to some of them, particularly in our culture where we encourage that period of immaturity, but for the majority of the existence of society, as well as in other cultures, there really isn't much of a true period of "adolescence", and children become adults at much younger times.
So there is more of a middle ground where it should be judged on an individual basis. A teenybopper in America who tries to dress like a Bratz doll to make herself feel mature and still dosen't have any life experience outside of what she knows from TV, is not a good candidate for any relationship, in my opinion, especially one with an older individual. A fifteen year old pioneer woman in the mid 1800's is probably likely to marry an older man, and have few problems with it. In ancient Egypt, 13 years was a common age for girls to marry, because in their culture, they became adults much earlier, and most teenagers made up a large majority of their workforce and population of common citizens. It dosen't work the same way nowadays, because with our system, there is a very technical divide, where teenagers are forced to keep that era of awkward existence between identities. They are not yet functioning adults, and thus aren't given respect or acknowledgement as such, and therefore, it is easy to see why many would be bothered by a teenager who felt ready to be one, since we try to raise them to develop on a slow same-rate scale. And with this system, it would be very hard to find a teenager who is genuinely mature, and who by making a decision to have any relationship, particularly with an older individual, still retains that mature judgement.
Citing that FMA has a lot of similarities to our modern culture, it's easy to place the same values to our interpretation of relationships in that world, but do remember that it is still the early 1900's, and there is clearly much less of that divide between youth and adulthood than there is today. Edward is an indivudual responsible for himself and his brother, a soldier, and a scientist with genius to match most older individuals surrounding him. By most standards, he is an adult. And it is a very significant point of character development that he begins to truly think as one, rather than simply believe he is by going through the motions. Depending on where we are in the series is pretty crucial on whether or not he still retains his childlike emotional state. In some ways, I can see Alphonse as being a naturally more wise and mature person than Edward, and he seems to have more of an interest in seeking guidance. That coupled with the fact that he seems to have had crushes on older women, it's possible that the person he ends up with would probably be older than he. (Even if it's just "Winry" type older.)
Winry herself is a self sufficient woman with a career, a steady outlook on life, and an ability to take care of herself. In that way, it's easy to see her as an adult, and it wouldn't bother me in the least to see her seek out a relationship with an older person. (Thinking... Havoc-ish, maybe?) She's proven that she can handle a lot on her own, and that she is smart enough to make that judgement for herself.
And... um... lightbulb.