i hate this money envious, self-comforting, ignorant blue collar trash... how maybe the fact that these morons didn't have the potential/brains/drive to get real jobs that can't be done by machines or well trained chimps. seriously you go down and you talk to the local contractor/taxi driver/iron worker; ask him if he had the chance to switch place with a mircosurgeon that makes over 50k per operation, would he? only a fool would turn down an offer like that, they don't do what they do out of pride or whatever... thats just crap they tell themselves and others so they don't have the face the reality of their wasted potential and their crappy existance.
Liberals are always wailing about how we need to stop cutting trees and save the environment...
actually most "liberals" are concerned more with small inconsequential issues such as education,
government corruption, or social reform. the people you speak of are a very small minority of the a larger whole, though it would be prudent to point out the fact that this faction is still smaller the amount of conservatives that base their decisions on god or have been linked to white supremacist groups.
but they expect other people to lose profits in their businesses, they expect other people to pay thousands more for oil because OH NO we can't hurt the goddamn caribou in alaska...
lose profits? well what about the countless conservatives that whine, bitch and moan about outsourcing... but wait that doesn't matter now does it?! cause that helps white americans while hurting non-white people around the world....
oil? hmmm... maybe... just maybe if you didn't go and decide to bring war to one of the leading oil producers in the entire god damned world there wouldn't be a need to tap domestic reserves just to offset the loss of oil production due to strife, war, and deliberate burning of wells.
and they do little more than recycle their cans, spew propaganda, and hold yet another rally about how we're doing this now and it's killing Mother Gaia, G. Dubya is bad, war is bad, Kennedy was bad, kill the babies...
rallies? you mean like the religious nutbags that protested the stem cells or anything else that is "unnatural" or "against God"
oh yeah one more thing... kennedy was considered one of the most liberal and progressive leaders of his day. in fact many believe that this is why he was killed.
so here's my challenge to you: READ A <censored for the kiddies> BOOK!!
Okeeday - first of all!
When I made the generalization about blue-collar workers being mostly conservatives, I worded that wrong. What I meant to say is that liberals are always pushing for radical change in the system, in policy, in this and that. Hell, that's their entire platform in a nutshell: change.
BUT what I meant to say is that they're hypocritical because all these changes and new policies will affect other people, will be implemented by other people, and will ultimately have nothing but good effects on the liberals. My whole point was that they really don't give a sh*t what happens to anybody else, they just want their little world to go okay.
And environmentalists are a section of liberals I singled out: I don't mean to say that's the only part I have a beef with. Okay, the 'inconsequential issues' that liberals really do have a platform on:
Education? No, indoctrination. They want to stuff pro-gay, evolutionist liberal ideals down the throats of every kid they can, because they know that it will pay off in a decade.
Pro-gay: I'm not a homophobe, I don't hate gays, I just don't want my kid to grow up thinking that being gay is just grrreat! Everybody is gay! Try it sometime! In the attempt to pussyfoot around the issue of gays, schools are promoting it, 100%.
Evolution: This is the indoctrination part. Remember that sticker on the science books that went to the state supreme court a little while ago? It was just a little harmless sticker, on the front of the book where kids are likely to see it maybe ten, twelve times in a year. And, on top of that, it doesn't even promote creationism! All the sticker said was this:
Evolution is a theory, not a proven fact. As such, you should approach evolution the same way every scientific theory is. Please keep and open mind and critically research the issue before making a decision.
Hmm, so the liberal people made such a big stink about that? It seems to me that we're regressing back to the Dark Ages, when Galileo was imprisoned for hypocrisy by saying the world was not the center of the universe. Liberals love their evolution theory
because it means that they can rationalize anything away: we're gonna die anyway, there is no god, there are no consequences, have fun while you can!
To sum up: People aren't making a big deal about the stickers because they are afraid of letting creation into schools, they are afraid of doubt being let into the Religion of Evolution. And it is a religion, because there are massive leaps of faith (the same size as those required by Cristianity, might I add) required just to assume we could have created life in the first place!
Don't get me started about evolution. I will fight to the death. And I will win. I swear it.
Liberals defend evolution ferociously because it completely destroys the foundation of conservatives, and that is Christian ideals. (Not Christianity, because OH NO we can't have religion mixed in here or we're all wackos) Simple things like Do Not Lie, Do Not Steal, Do Not Commit Adultery, Do Not Murder, Do Not Cheat Others, all the simple decencies of life. This is what religious people base their decisions on, NOT their religion. If you find fault with these ideals, please tell me. Because after all, our f*cking CONSTITUTION is based on it, so OH NO we need to get rid of that too!
Well, you'll have to name exactly what you mean anyway. However, the topic of oil is always a big deal to people. Why? We buy oil at a high price from the Middle East mostly out of charity, because we did and do have oil in Alaska, Texas, all over America and Canada. People scream the G Dubya is corrupt because he buys oil from the Middle East - well dammit, we did that for years and years before he got into office! I think it's a smart move - to keep a little nest egg of oil yourself, then buy it from others while the economy is good. That way if they ever run out of oil, we're not gonna be screwed ten ways to Thursday by the Saudis.
I do believe oil had a part to play in the war on Iraq, but for the most part it was to keep the nation economially stable once we've flushed out Saddam. I mean, seriously - if G Dubya's main motive was oil, then why doesn't he just annex the entire oil field and claim the resources as repayment for liberating Iraq?
BECAUSE HE IS LOOKING FOR BOTH AMERICA AND IRAQ'S
BENEFIT. If they have oil, we can continue to keep our reserves for a rainy day. If they have oil, then the nation will not fall to pieces, because oil is about the #1 export of Iraq. And of course if it does fall apart, all the blasted liberals will simply leave them to rot, maybe throw some taxpayer's dollars at it every once in a while. Conservatives instead stay there and offer support until we're sure Iraq can stand on its own, then leave once the job is done.
That's another thing that irks me: liberals seem to think that they can stop any war at any time, and the other nation will magically go back to how it was before we went in, they will harbor no ill will about our half-assed job of helping them, and of course they will gushingly thank the nice liberals for saving them from the army that keeps all the terrorists away.
THERE IS NO 'BACK' BUTTON. IT IS TOO F*CKING LATE TO PULL OUT OF IRAQ WITHOUT MAKING SURE THEY CAN SUPPORT THEIR OWN ECONOMY AND DEFEND AGAINST THE TERRORISTS THAT ARE STILL THERE!!
If you want to replace the corroded support beams of a building, you can't just walk away before putting the new ones in - finish the job or the whole thing is gonna fall down.
And again - blue collar workers would
take the job as a brain surgeon, but the fact is that no matter what job they do, it will be done, done well, and finished the first time. They wouldn't promise a patient a full heart transplant and halfway through pull off their gloves and say,
'I don't really feel like it. Here, you cover for me.'
Oh and I really like that comparison, because a liberal would also promise them an organ transplant without a single thought about who would be donating the organ. They just want this
to get done, and if you have to give your liver, then you should be glad to. Otherwise you're an insensitive bigot who can't deal with changing times or some bullsh*t.
I never said anything bad about rallies , it just seems like that's about 75% of all liberal groups do. They create organizations that pat each other on the back for doing almost nothing, then hold another rally to complain about something new.
AT LEAST WE DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!!! I'd put ten grand down that if the liberals were in power when 9/11 occurred, they would just throw money at the victims, create a support group to counsel the families affected, and not give another thought to the terrorists who did the deed. I know I'm being stereotypical, but that is the way liberals handle problems.
Again, back when being liberal was a join-or-die kind of movement years ago, they would protest the cutting of trees, protest the war, but then the companies that had to halt production because a bunch of hippies were on their property were just collateral damage. All the people that died in the war so far would have died for absolutely nothing, because we'd just pull out and give up.
I know I'm being stereotypical, but I haven't met a single liberal who isn't:
Squeamish about handling a difficult issue, (Better to let the conservatives handle it, then whine about how it is being done.)
Has a political attention span of about two months,
And wants radical change to every aspect of the nation -- as long as they don't need to do the work.