What a randomly strange topic.....
Here's my two cents.... regardless of whether a baby 'can or cannot give concent' for the removal of the foreskin, it doesn't mean its wrong to do this procedure. I know there are some religions that are against it, so therefore they don't do it. It has been proven to be more hygienic if it is done which is why its recommended by doctors.
I think that its a rediculous bill to even think about due to the fact that, yes it can be risky as far as a slip up and damaging male extremities, but that's also a rare incident.
I think the people opposed to this procedure are hiding behind the fact that a baby can't give concent on whether or not to have excess skin removed.
I don't support that at all and according to the small article, neither do the massachusetts government.