HAGANE NO RENKINJUTSUSHI
HAGANE NO RENKINJUTSUSHI
full metal alchemist
full metal alchemist
 



Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
New Star Wars Trilogy Vs Old Star Wars Trilogy
Which one do you prefer?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 28
Guests cannot vote 
esrz22
post Nov 11 2006, 11:57 AM
Post #31


State Alchemist (Major)
****

Group: Members
Posts: 661
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Ohio
Member No.: 42,735
Gender: Male



Old by far.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
phoenix dying
post Nov 11 2006, 01:13 PM
Post #32


Brigadier General
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,089
Joined: 28-December 04
From: purgatory
Member No.: 4,695
Gender: Male



The 'old' starwars had what you called storyline. This was Lucas in his prime, doing his best work.(given the time and age). The old movie have lore and heroic/epic storyline. What the new one have is lights, action, and loud noises. This is all too common place in movies these days. They lack the indept story, just quick flashes. Mediocre at best story line, then big finish. Boom! Actually after saying that; you could say that the new Star Wars is like bad sex, really. mellow.gif


--------------------


Drinking women, chasing whiskey

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Funderful
post Nov 11 2006, 01:42 PM
Post #33


State Alchemist (Major)
****

Group: Members
Posts: 746
Joined: 7-October 06
Member No.: 41,785
Gender: Not Telling



The old one.
As the world evolves, the minds of the creatures upon it crumble and turn to ash.
The new ones are pieces of crap, but they're no shorter, unfortunately.
So, no, you can't have to 3 hours of your life Episode II discarded.
;-; I'm sorry.
At least you got your money's worth-wait-no you didn't...
My apologies, once more.

I still love the work of the beardy one.
Indiana Jones needs more recognization. >>
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synth Alchemist
post Nov 12 2006, 09:29 AM
Post #34


Alchemists
***

Group: Members
Posts: 439
Joined: 12-November 06
From: Tokugawa Age
Member No.: 42,768
Gender: Male



I think the old trilogy, because it have bad effects and that makes it cool


--------------------
Live by honour, kill by stealth




Tnx nil-chan for the sig!!!! :D


Happy New Year!


Oh my god i'm an State alchemist!!!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vash_the_Gunslin...
post Nov 12 2006, 09:31 AM
Post #35


Major General
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,100
Joined: 21-March 06
From: Wisconsin
Member No.: 33,355
Gender: Male



The old is better by far. Lot more entertaining.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chiyo
post Nov 13 2006, 02:46 AM
Post #36


Moderator Emeritus
******

Group: Members
Posts: 6,073
Joined: 27-January 05
From: a land called Honah Lee
Member No.: 6,466
Gender: Not Telling



QUOTE(Johichiro_Nishi @ Nov 12 2006, 04:29 PM) [snapback]472720[/snapback]
I think the old trilogy, because it have bad effects and that makes it cool


....makes sense. I think what you are trying to say is the effects make it special whereas for the new Trilogy we have seen that sort of CGI all before.


--------------------

Avatar & Sig by me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
esrz22
post Nov 15 2006, 06:52 PM
Post #37


State Alchemist (Major)
****

Group: Members
Posts: 661
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Ohio
Member No.: 42,735
Gender: Male



QUOTE(Johichiro_Nishi @ Nov 12 2006, 11:29 AM) [snapback]472720[/snapback]
I think the old trilogy, because it have bad effects and that makes it cool

"Bad" only in relation to modern. The effects of Star Wars were new and really changed the industry.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GREEDisGOOD
post Jan 20 2007, 06:32 PM
Post #38


Alchemists
***

Group: Members
Posts: 286
Joined: 9-January 07
From: The middle of nowhere, South Dakota
Member No.: 43,729
Gender: Male



If you picked anything other than the original, you cannot be a true fan of the series. If you judge the two trilogies by their effects, then you're an idiot. Movies are good because of the story and acting, not because of the special effects. The original trilogy is on a whole different level from the new three. They were all perfect.
The new three are not even close. Though, of course, I liked them all, they all have large flaws. Episode I looked like a little kids movie, with annoying jokes and childish dialogue, though Liam Neeson (Qui-Gon) acting was as up to par as usual. Episode II was the worst. It was a bunch of different plots thrown together in a bad way. The romance between Anakin and Padame was horrible, the dialogue between the two was terribly cliche. I did like all of the clues that showed what was going to happen, though, and the fight at the end was good.
Episode III is by far the best of the new three. But its major flaw is that in this move Lucas seems to overdo it with the computer graphics. Many of hte places he overdoes the special effects, but the dialogue and acting are poor. But, this one may be even better than the originals if you only take in the movie from where the Jedi are killed off to the end fight, which was, in my opinion, the best duel in any of the movies. Plus, the very end to this movie was the best in any of the movies, easily.
But I am afraid that Lucas was doomed from the beginning. He could never outdo his work in the 70's and 80's. But I've grown up on Star Wars and, as a whole, its one of the best movie sagas ever made.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th August 2016 - 03:08 AM



Copyright 2003-2004 PhoenixNetworks, LLC. All rights reserved.
Copyright Notice. Privacy policy. Acceptable Use Policy. Terms of Service.
Page Generation Time: 0.0655 seconds.
Currently Selected Stylesheet: css/default.css